theoneagain asked:


from the webmaster

Although the device is efficient, in most all water heating applications it is difficult to economically justify a device. The company has moved towards the mixing and reaction chemistry applications and specialized heating applications. The system can heat water, but there are numerous competing technologies that can heat water and make steam that are much less capital intensive and often cheaper to operate, as electricity is an expensive and highly refined fuel when compared to gas, coal or oil. Because of this we ceased marketing home/residential heating systems and generic steam systems. Our core heating applications are now applications where:

A fluid scales rapidly on a heat transfer surface

Safety/operational concerns demand a flameless system for safety
Total automation is needed and not available with conventional technology

Our heating applications are largely niche applications where conventional technology falls short. Examples of heating applications well suited to the device include:

Heating of food products such as cheese, eggs and chocolate
Heating chemical and polymeric streams
Heating industrial brines and heavy salt solutions

Our company continues to strive to bring our customers the best industrial heating, mixing and reactor solutions.

PRODUCT REVIEW

HYDRODYNAMICS.com or http://www.totalsep.com/sprmoreinfo.htm

KING

Share and Learn about Wood:) These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Ask
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Netscape
  • Squidoo
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

lakmonster on 25 July, 2009 at 12:06 am #

RUBIN

where do i invest?


etereal05 on 26 July, 2009 at 11:52 pm #

MURRAY

withouth violating (violently.. lol) the law of energy conservation, it seems the specific design of the holed rotor make water ABSORB energy or some kind, heating itself… the attention should be not on critics, but on WHERE that energy come from, and how is been tampered…


red33410 on 29 July, 2009 at 7:13 pm #

PHIL

See the size of the motor to the guy’s LEFT? Holy CRAP!!! That motor is HUGE!!!


jwiska on 31 July, 2009 at 3:16 pm #

ORVILLE

damn so all these years in engineering school have been a waste…? ohh man


flr829 on 3 August, 2009 at 5:24 pm #

STEVE

what do you have to say on that einstein?


mswinman on 3 August, 2009 at 11:50 pm #

RAPHAEL

Yeh right, can be you specific of external observers?????? Be honest you’re full of ****!!!!


ya19375 on 5 August, 2009 at 9:30 pm #

PIERRE

is this device based on the diesel motor? the compression of a substance increases its tempature. so the water is being compressed, and heated. and somehow it creates more energy then it uses?


kmarinas86 on 6 August, 2009 at 2:44 pm #

RAUL

How many particles with momentum is there water? A lot!

What is temperature based on? The ability of a substance to thermally radiate.

Can by changing the material to thermally radiate can one ignite a fire larger than the one used to start it? Yes, people one can do this! The forest fires in California start small, and they grow big. The power of the fire is not a constant. Forest fires do not flow the local ordinances of power conservation, they follow the law of conservation of energy!


andrewsengineering on 9 August, 2009 at 2:28 pm #

SYLVESTER

I recently completed a smaller version myself. I have not optimized the rotor but it takes a full 5HP to spin it. As far as efficiency is concerned you have to take into account for losses in electrical energy which is dissipated in the form of heat through the motor and friction from bearings, seals etc. It takes roughly 3KW power at 240v for a 3 phase 5HP motor, and what they’re using is much bigger, and it’s not generating near the volume of steam it would require to actually power itself.


heraclio82 on 9 August, 2009 at 3:26 pm #

HERSHEL

how much does one of the pumps cost to put in my home I like that PLease get back to me


superafterburner on 11 August, 2009 at 1:25 am #

HIRAM

There is some energy in the input water, but it probably isn’t enough to account for 70% extra.


ROHDDEVA on 14 August, 2009 at 11:11 am #

JC

is cool realy


kshackleton on 15 August, 2009 at 10:11 pm #

TOD

The law of conservation of energy has always applied everywhere that it has ever been measured. There are no known exceptions at all.

Anyone claiming to have gotten more out a process than has gone into it had better come up with very convincing evidence for all to see. If demonstrated….instant billionaire.

However, it’s far more likely to simply be bullshit.


islandfd3s on 18 August, 2009 at 5:53 am #

THOMAS

I think even if you find a very efficient steam generator (tesla turbine perhaps?) and use it to generate the power (via electricity, or just using the turbine itself to power the pump after getting things started with an electric starter) you’d see that eventually you’ll run out of steam.

Even still, if this is just a very efficient/cheap way to heat water, what’s wrong with that?


massai86 on 20 August, 2009 at 4:03 am #

PRESTON

calm down kid, you’re past your bedtime or something


iuliusceasar on 21 August, 2009 at 5:48 am #

WARD

Yea, you don’t know physics. STFU!!


MrZhuKeeper on 23 August, 2009 at 12:58 am #

LARRY

what if that energy some how converted matter in energy… like E=MC2?

lol…i don’t know physics though.


urantivirus on 25 August, 2009 at 3:12 pm #

JOSEPH

Unless you measure any left over electricity coming from the generator. “Over-unity”


urantivirus on 27 August, 2009 at 10:55 pm #

JAMAR

He should use that steam to power a generator to power the electric pump creating the steam. It will only prove unity. But right now he’s proven nothing.


trud2kop on 30 August, 2009 at 11:53 am #

MARCUS

I think it’s not breaking any laws of physics. Laws are discovered, not created. And the conservation of energy law does apply almost anywhere, including here because the open environment is used also, it’s not a closed system. Am I wrong?


BenHileday on 31 August, 2009 at 10:14 am #

WADE

Since President Bush.


BenHileday on 1 September, 2009 at 10:48 pm #

JACKSON

yes please mention these thermodynamic laws.


kaduisaui on 2 September, 2009 at 2:49 pm #

JESUS

I see what you mean. But, If this system is at least more efficient than propane or gas to make hot water then it should replace the old technology right? Let’s see…solar panel to battery to motor to water hammer to tank to shower to red hot ********* for free!


whyamionfire1 on 4 September, 2009 at 6:45 pm #

JACK

Need I mention the laws of thermodynamics? This video is lying to you. Sorry to burst everyone’s bubbles.


LuminaChannel on 5 September, 2009 at 4:43 pm #

LOREN

yesssssss!